#cdnPoli, #cadPoli,
Supporting Links
Sign The Petition!
https://petitions.ourcommons.ca/en/Petition/Details?Petition=e-1906
People’s Party Website
https://www.peoplespartyofcanada.ca/
Join The Conversation!
https://canadapoli.com/Community/index.php
Yellow Vests Canada – Protests Scheduled
https://yellowvestscanada.net/events.html
Donate Button for me!
https://canadapoli.com/donations/
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
Bernier on UNPA
1/ Of course I agree that world gov is not going to happen any time soon @acoyne.
But that’s not the point. The point is we have a PM who believes in this goal and takes decisions accordingly.
Is he compromising Canada’s interests in pursuit of this utopian globalist goal? https://t.co/vkeM04Xhs6
— Maxime Bernier (@MaximeBernier) January 12, 2019
2/ Also, there are more and more supposedly “non-binding” agreements such as the Paris Accord and the Migrations Compact that are having a direct impact on policy making in Canada.
My concern is that this growing globalism is impacting us NOW, not in 200 years.
— Maxime Bernier (@MaximeBernier) January 12, 2019
My latest: I, for one, welcome our new world parliament overlordshttps://t.co/Psoqs79rW3
— Andrew Coyne 🇺🇦 (@acoyne) January 12, 2019
Coyne – One World Parliament overlords
https://outline.com/MLp45K
Ouch! @VassyKapelos
And by the way, glad you could corroborate everything I wrote about this UNPA campaign to establish a World Parliament with the power to adopt binding regulations, as well as Trudeau’s support of it, simply by checking the sources.
See how easy it is @VassyKapelos? https://t.co/vkeM04Xhs6
— Maxime Bernier (@MaximeBernier) January 12, 2019
Bernier on c-46
C-46 is a horrendous attack on our right to live free from arbitrary harassment by the state.
Despite the constant BS about tolerance and diversity, the Trudeau government is eroding our basic freedoms one by one.
Time for a reset in October 2019.#FREEDOM#RESPONSIBILITY https://t.co/YjiGpcfsFT
— Maxime Bernier (@MaximeBernier) January 12, 2019
Chris Selley: Canadians, prepare to be breathalyzed https://t.co/B0x4JOFgKd pic.twitter.com/2da6d43NgR
— National Post (@nationalpost) January 11, 2019
“It may sound unbelievable, but Canada’s revised laws on impaired driving could see police demand breath samples in bars, restaurants or even at home. And if you say no, you could be arrested, face a criminal record, ordered to pay a fine, and subjected to a driving suspension.” https://t.co/F8rchWtGtH
— Maxime Bernier (@MaximeBernier) January 13, 2019
“You could be in violation of the impaired driving laws even two hours after you’ve been driving. Now, the onus is on drivers to prove they weren’t impaired when they were on the road.”
In the Liberal Police State, we are now guilty until proven innocent. https://t.co/F8rchWtGtH
— Maxime Bernier (@MaximeBernier) January 13, 2019
“Under the new law, police officers no longer need to have a ‘reasonable suspicion’ the driver had consumed alcohol. Now, an officer can demand a sample from drivers for any reason at any time.”
= Liberal Police State https://t.co/F8rchWtGtH
— Maxime Bernier (@MaximeBernier) January 13, 2019
“While criminal lawyers predict the new law will be challenged, likely through appeal courts and even to the Supreme Court of Canada, they expect that process will take several years. In the meantime, they say drivers are vulnerable to unfair arrests and prosecution.” https://t.co/F8rchWtGtH
— Maxime Bernier (@MaximeBernier) January 13, 2019
The Liberal Police State:
“Canadians could now face criminal charges for driving with illegal amounts of alcohol in their system, even if they were stone cold sober while behind the wheel, under tough new impaired driving laws, according to criminal defence lawyers.” https://t.co/d8Zecv0m1Z
— Maxime Bernier (@MaximeBernier) January 13, 2019
The Liberal Police State:
“Police no longer need to have any reasonable grounds to suspect you're impaired, or driving with a blood alcohol concentration of more than .08, before demanding you submit to testing. Refusing the test can result in a criminal charge.” https://t.co/d8Zecv0m1Z
— Maxime Bernier (@MaximeBernier) January 13, 2019
The Liberal Police State:
“Previously, if drivers could prove they weren't yet over the legal limit when they were stopped by police, a court could find them innocent.
The new law removes that defence.” https://t.co/d8Zecv0m1Z— Maxime Bernier (@MaximeBernier) January 13, 2019
Guilty until proven innocent in the Liberal Police State:
“The charge is considered a ‘reverse onus’ in legal terms. Police don't have to prove your blood alcohol content was over the limit when you were driving two hours earlier.
It's now up to you to prove you were sober.” https://t.co/d8Zecv0m1Z— Maxime Bernier (@MaximeBernier) January 13, 2019
Instead of being tougher with real drunk drivers, this law will create a whole new category of false criminals.
It’s based on the same stupid logic as our gun laws that harass law-abiding gun owners instead of cracking down on real criminals. https://t.co/d8Zecv0m1Z
— Maxime Bernier (@MaximeBernier) January 13, 2019