Climate Change, IPCC, Rigged Data sets – But we TOTALLY need a Carbon Tax?

Funny we live in a Country that is Carbon neutral but we are supposed to cut emissions? Why? the Carbon output is not a problem here put pressure on the non-neutral countries leave us alone UN quit trying to tell us what to do clean up your own mess https://t.co/xTPLARJcwG

— Gronk (@lookin_robb) October 10, 2018

For perspective here are GHG Emission increases/decreases in 2017 by country.

Canada + 3.4%
Brazil + 1.3%
Russia + 1.3%
China + 1.6%
India + 4.4%
Pakistan + 7.4%
France + 2%
New Zealand + 5.4%

USA – .5%
Mexico – 2.9%
UK – 2.7%

Funny how Cdn. media rarely talk about this.

— Bill Brasky (@Polkameister) October 9, 2018

If you are wondering what you can do about climate change:

The world's top scientists just gave rigorous backing to systematically dismantle capitalism as a key requirement to maintaining civilization and a habitable planet.

I mean, if you are looking for something to do. https://t.co/e5l7EWnRSC

— Eric Holthaus (@EricHolthaus) October 8, 2018

This plan has been on the works for years pic.twitter.com/tipysqkVZV

— JC (@EternalQuest27) October 9, 2018

The UN's 'climate porn' is getting us nowhere. My Wednesday Toronto Sun column https://t.co/0XegcxmIdo #cdnpoli

— Lorrie Goldstein (@sunlorrie) October 9, 2018

You can now choose between a Nobel Prize winning economist and Kenney/Ford/Scheer when deciding who is right about the economics of pollution pricing. https://t.co/ESHcfXHayb

— Gerald Butts (@gmbutts) October 8, 2018

Laureate William Nordhaus’ research shows that the most efficient remedy for problems caused by greenhouse gas emissions is a global scheme of carbon taxes uniformly imposed on all countries. The diagram shows CO2 emissions for four climate policies according to his simulations. pic.twitter.com/tmxUE6MiLn

— The Nobel Prize (@NobelPrize) October 8, 2018