Update – MP Cooper Removed From Justice Committee

CanadaPoli Canada Politics 19 Comments

#cdnPoli, #cadPoli, #LPC, #CPC, #PPC, #Maxime Bernier, #People’s Party of Canada, #SNC #Canadian Corruption, #lavscam, #lavgate, #sncgate, #noCronyCorruption, #NoCronyCapitalism #fridgegate

Supporting Links

People’s Party Website
https://www.peoplespartyofcanada.ca/

Join The Conversation!
https://canadapoli.com/Community/index.php

Donate Button for me!

Donations

Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.

Cooper Stripped of Justice Committee Position
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/scheer-michael-cooper-justice-committee-kicked-out-christchurch-1.5159082

VIce
https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/3k3ppk/how-right-wing-extremism-has-changed-the-lives-of-canadian-muslim-women

CBC on Christchurch and Quebec
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/quebec-reax-new-zealand-mosque-shootings-1.5057737

Scheer’s Tweet

Michael Cooper Apology

Spencer Fernando

Andrew Scheer Boots Michael Cooper Off Justice Committee After Controversial Clash With Witness

Huffpo
https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/entry/michael-cooper-andrew-scheer-online-hate_ca_5cf32de3e4b0e8085e3b245b

Joe Haze
https://twitter.com/Alzer_One/status/1135124475140300800

Comments 19

  1. Avatar

    I like Cooper because he has the balls to call it as he see’s it. This goes to show you that the CP are not different from the Liberals. Scheer is a looser.

  2. Avatar

    1- was there any mention of ISIS/Hamas propaganda online and its effect on violence around the world?
    2- did anyone question the Muslim witness on it?

  3. Avatar

    2011 christchurch earthquake
    [SIZE=4][B]Mossad spy ring ‘unearthed because of Christchurch earthquake'[/B][/SIZE]

    [URL]https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/newzealand/8649223/Mossad-spy-ring-unearthed-because-of-Christchurch-earthquake.html[/URL]
    [SIZE=4]The Israeli secret service Mossad has been accused of conducting an intelligence-gathering operation in New Zealand which was unearthed because of February’s Christchurch earthquake.[/SIZE]
    “The unusual circumstances which triggered the investigation was the rapid departure from the country of the three surviving members of the group of Israelis in question,” he said.

    “Security agencies conducted the investigation and found no evidence that the people were anything other than backpackers,” Mr Key said.

    Benyamin Mizrahi, 23, the Israeli man who died in the damaged van, was found to have five passports on his person, the Southland Times newspaper reported.
    Three surviving Israelis who were in the van with Mr Mizrahi fled [B]New Zealand[/B] within 12 hours, making their way back to Israel.

    There were fears that other Israeli operatives, in the city after the February 22 quake which killed 181 people, could have embedded malicious software to access intelligence information.

    Speaking during a visit to the United States, Mr Key said the unusual circumstances of the incident were fully investigated and no evidence was found that the people involved were anything other than backpackers

    [URL]https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/jul/20/christchurch-earthquake-israeli-spy-investigation[/URL]
    New Zealand prime minister confirms, but then plays down, investigation over Israeli victim said to have held five passports
    There was widespread speculation in New Zealand that the country could be facing asequel to the events of 2004, when Helen Clark’s government imposed diplomatic sanctions on Israel after two suspected Mossad agents were convicted of passport fraud in Auckland
    Key said he had been advised that reports of Israeli citizens carrying multiple passports were ill-founded and he was satisfied with police assurances that there had been no unauthorised access to the police computer system.

    “The investigations that have been undertaken have been thorough and have found no evidence of a link between the group and Israeli intelligence.”

    [SIZE=7][B]New Zealand mosque shooting suspect reportedly visited Israel in 2016[/B][/SIZE]
    [URL]https://www.timesofisrael.com/new-zealand-mosque-shooting-suspect-reportedly-visited-israel-in-2016/[/URL]

    [SIZE=4]Official quoted as saying there were no red flags in security check of Brenton Tarrant; Greek, Bulgaria, Turkey, Croatia, and Hungary also confirm trips[/SIZE]
    [URL]https://www.reuters.com/article/us-newzealand-shootout-israel/suspected-new-zealand-mosque-gunman-visited-israel-in-2016-idUSKCN1QY0WT[/URL]

    [MEDIA=youtube]lFW1kqdfzOg[/MEDIA]

  4. Avatar
  5. Avatar

    [QUOTE=”AV8TOR, post: 13915, member: 33″]I like Cooper because he has the balls to call it as he see’s it. This goes to show you that the CP are not different from the Liberals. Scheer is a looser.[/QUOTE]
    I like poor Mr Cooper too. I cannot believe how bad it is that he has been demoted publicly and that Canadian politicians mostly all think like crazy leftist cult members. They should have the water tested around Parliament Hill; maybe the water is the problem up there?
    I can only hope that Mr Cooper can think of something we can all do to help this dire situation or that he will join Mr Bernier…

  6. Avatar

    [QUOTE=”jcorvec, post: 13982, member: 31″]I like poor Mr Cooper too. I cannot believe how bad it is that he has been demoted publicly and that Canadian politicians mostly all think like crazy leftist cult members. They should have the water tested around Parliament Hill; maybe the water is the problem up there?
    I can only hope that Mr Cooper can think of something we can all do to help this dire situation or that he will join Mr Bernier…[/QUOTE]

    Does anyone else thing society has become oversensitive to being PC? Also it seems MP’s are not allowed to speak their mind about subjects. Tow the party line and be PC or else your out. The special interest groups are on a “hair trigger” just looking for something to cry about. They also have a hair up their asses.
    I once worked with at black guy (if you think saying black is offensive. Suck it up and FO!) who had a chip on his shoulder about anything black. BTW his wife was white. He was always looking for a reason to go off. If you said something like, “Those storm clouds look awfully dark, might rain.” He would loose his shit because you implied he was dark and file a grievance on you. After time no one would go near him or talk to him for fear of the hair up his black ass. My opinion was he was just an ass hole. I found the same with native co-workers and gay people (back then they were just gay or homos. LGBTQ wasn’t invented then). And really no one cared what a person was. Just do your job and get along with others. It wasn’t complicated.
    This special treatment and status of special interest groups is making this white old school honky mother f**ker bias and resentful towards “these people”. Fit in, get along or f**k off.

    [ATTACH]804[/ATTACH]

  7. Avatar

    [QUOTE=”AV8TOR, post: 13984, member: 33″]Does anyone else thing society has become oversensitive to being PC? Also it seems MP’s are not allowed to speak their mind about subjects. Tow the party line and be PC or else your out. The special interest groups are on a “hair trigger” just looking for something to cry about. They also have a hair up their asses.
    I once worked with at black guy (if you think saying black is offensive. Suck it up and FO!) who had a chip on his shoulder about anything black. BTW his wife was white. He was always looking for a reason to go off. If you said something like, “Those storm clouds look awfully dark, might rain.” He would loose his shit because you implied he was dark and file a grievance on you. After time no one would go near him or talk to him for fear of the hair up his black ass. My opinion was he was just an ass hole. I found the same with native co-workers and gay people (back then they were just gay or homos. LGBTQ wasn’t invented then). And really no one cared what a person was. Just do your job and get along with others. It wasn’t complicated.
    This special treatment and status of special interest groups is making this white old school honky mother f**ker bias and resentful towards “these people”. Fit in, get along or f**k off.

    [ATTACH]804[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
    Don’t people like that have anything else to think about? I wouldn’t have had time and energy throughout my life to be like that – if a person has a baby to take care of, a job to go to, parents to help, shopping to do, a trip to go on, a walk to go on…..Not very productive, these wuphiny lefties or special groups. It’s muslim men who get their women to do all the childcare and procuring of goods or food, or LGBTQ who do not have, apparently, enough to do.

  8. Avatar

    [QUOTE=”jcorvec, post: 13988, member: 31″]LGBTQ who do not have, apparently, enough to do.[/QUOTE]
    Can you imagine the out cry if Canada minted a coin depicting stay at home Mom’s who look after the children and take care of the home?
    It would be the end of the world.

  9. Avatar

    [QUOTE=”AV8TOR, post: 13984, member: 33″]Does anyone else thing society has become oversensitive to being PC? Also it seems MP’s are not allowed to speak their mind about subjects. Tow the party line and be PC or else your out. The special interest groups are on a “hair trigger” just looking for something to cry about. They also have a hair up their asses.
    I once worked with at black guy (if you think saying black is offensive. Suck it up and FO!) who had a chip on his shoulder about anything black. BTW his wife was white. He was always looking for a reason to go off. If you said something like, “Those storm clouds look awfully dark, might rain.” He would loose his shit because you implied he was dark and file a grievance on you. After time no one would go near him or talk to him for fear of the hair up his black ass. My opinion was he was just an ass hole. I found the same with native co-workers and gay people (back then they were just gay or homos. LGBTQ wasn’t invented then). And really no one cared what a person was. Just do your job and get along with others. It wasn’t complicated.
    This special treatment and status of special interest groups is making this white old school honky mother f**ker bias and resentful towards “these people”. Fit in, get along or f**k off.

    [ATTACH]804[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
    That is the goal. Get everyone hate’n on everyone. It is frustrating as hell yet knowing that is part of the agenda should help you see past most of this mess. We are all being used.

  10. Avatar

    [QUOTE=”AV8TOR, post: 13990, member: 33″]Can you imagine the out cry if Canada minted a coin depicting stay at home Mom’s who look after the children and take care of the home?
    It would be the end of the world.[/QUOTE]
    Are coins in Canada, England, France and Germany now going to have all Taj Mahal depictions and mosques on them soon? Boy oh boy….

  11. Avatar
  12. Avatar

    [QUOTE=”Unibrow, post: 14036, member: 407″]Bringing up China in the quote spoken by Mr. Cooper was strike three.[/QUOTE]
    Can you tell me what he said about the China fiasco? I’ve been trying to keep up with everything but didn’t notice.

  13. Avatar

    [QUOTE=”Unibrow, post: 14036, member: 407″]Bringing up China in the quote spoken by Mr. Cooper was strike three.[/QUOTE]
    Can you tell me what he said about the China fiasco? I hope he got a good dig in before he left….
    I’ve been following everything but missed that….

  14. Avatar

    [QUOTE=”AV8TOR, post: 13984, member: 33″]Does anyone else thing society has become oversensitive to being PC? Also it seems MP’s are not allowed to speak their mind about subjects. Tow the party line and be PC or else your out. The special interest groups are on a “hair trigger” just looking for something to cry about. They also have a hair up their asses.
    I once worked with at black guy (if you think saying black is offensive. Suck it up and FO!) who had a chip on his shoulder about anything black. BTW his wife was white. He was always looking for a reason to go off. If you said something like, “Those storm clouds look awfully dark, might rain.” He would loose his shit because you implied he was dark and file a grievance on you. After time no one would go near him or talk to him for fear of the hair up his black ass. My opinion was he was just an ass hole. I found the same with native co-workers and gay people (back then they were just gay or homos. LGBTQ wasn’t invented then). And really no one cared what a person was. Just do your job and get along with others. It wasn’t complicated.
    This special treatment and status of special interest groups is making this white old school honky mother f**ker bias and resentful towards “these people”. Fit in, get along or f**k off.

    [ATTACH]804[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]

    Tow the party line or out? Yup. I know two conservative EDA members that were booted from their positions for questioning immigration.

  15. Avatar

    [QUOTE=”jcorvec, post: 14066, member: 31″]Can you tell me what he said about the China fiasco? I hope he got a good dig in before he left….
    I’ve been following everything but missed that….[/QUOTE]
    Mr.Cooper quoted from the C.C. manifesto.Within the quote from the C.C. manifesto, the “author”stated he was more inline with China’s ways politically than any other. That was strike three. Strike 1) Challenging what a person on the left says. Strike 2) Telling someone from the left they should be ashamed of themselves about anything. Strike 3) Connecting C.C. with China anything in this country (even though that is what was contained in the manifesto and was an accurate quote read by Mr.Cooper).

  16. Avatar

    [QUOTE=”Unibrow, post: 14080, member: 407″]Mr.Cooper quoted from the C.C. manifesto.Within the quote from the C.C. manifesto, the “author”stated he was more inline with China’s ways politically than any other. That was strike three. Strike 1) Challenging what a person on the left says. Strike 2) Telling someone from the left they should be ashamed of themselves about anything. Strike 3) Connecting C.C. with China anything in this country (even though that is what was contained in the manifesto and was an accurate quote read by Mr.Cooper).[/QUOTE]
    I forgot that the gunman had said/written that. (although like some say I don’t think he wrote all those pages himself completely) It was in the pages though, yes, apparently. It’s all about censorship anyway with lefties upset over anybody thinking rationally. They are crazy.
    Libs should really be extra irate that the gunman liked a regime close to theirs! (because Communist China is like Trudeau)

  17. Avatar

    Hello Mark… I made a comment on your Cooper video Part 2 that got no response, though it was well thought out. I copied that comment to a different video on the same topic by a different content creator. There it also got no response, though it was a very provocative comment on a site where it would have gotten immediate attention because of that. Then I decided to check if maybe it was shadow banned by using a different browser in private mode, and sure enough, the comment was not to be seen, neither on your video nor on the other. It was shadow banned. The question is – by who? I suspect it was Google. This is very disconcerting. It means free speech is dead. My comment was factual and there was no reason to shadowban it. It doesn’t hit any of the categories. I will repost it here. Please tell me if you think it should have been censored…

    ***

    What’s at the bottom of this? The fact that Islam is a warrior’s cult, founded by the first Islamic terrorist Mohammad who massacred the jews in Medina and took their women as sex slaves. Islam is the only religion that advocates a vile, oppressive, supremacist ideology promoted and defended by violence. In fact the fundamental teachings of Islam represent a moral inversion of Western values. Every conservative knows this now, as this knowledge has spread far and wide online. The spread of this knowledge, principally by conservatives, is what the Muslim activist was complaining about before the Justice Committee. However, to make this statement leaves us with two profound questions.

    1.) Was Cooper’s response appropriate or to the contrary, was it worthy of censure?
    2.) Does this information represent “Online hate”?

    On Cooper’s response, it was poorly articulated. The argument that should have been made was that though conservatives spread this information, they are not to be blamed for the two massacres because they spoke truth. We cannot fathom the motives and what influenced these mass murders, because they fall so far from normalcy that from our perspective they were insane. We are not responsible for their actions. The entire internet cannot be shut down because it may trigger the insane.

    Does this information spread about Islam represent “Online hate”? No. It is Islam that hates. Islam hates the apostates and gays. Islam hates the Jews. Islam hates women. Islam hates anybody who is not a Muslim. To make this statement is not hate, just as to condemn the Nazis is not to condemn all Germans. “Not all Muslims… etc, etc, etc.” I am not speaking of Muslims here, each of which has their own interpretation of Islam. I am speaking strictly about the religion and political ideology of Islam.

  18. Avatar

    [QUOTE=”TropicalCoder, post: 14118, member: 304″]Hello Mark… I made a comment on your Cooper video Part 2 that got no response, though it was well thought out. I copied that comment to a different video on the same topic by a different content creator. There it also got no response, though it was a very provocative comment on a site where it would have gotten immediate attention because of that. Then I decided to check if maybe it was shadow banned by using a different browser in private mode, and sure enough, the comment was not to be seen, neither on your video nor on the other. It was shadow banned. The question is – by who? I suspect it was Google. This is very disconcerting. It means free speech is dead. My comment was factual and there was no reason to shadowban it. It doesn’t hit any of the categories. I will repost it here. Please tell me if you think it should have been censored…

    ***

    What’s at the bottom of this? The fact that Islam is a warrior’s cult, founded by the first Islamic terrorist Mohammad who massacred the jews in Medina and took their women as sex slaves. Islam is the only religion that advocates a vile, oppressive, supremacist ideology promoted and defended by violence. In fact the fundamental teachings of Islam represent a moral inversion of Western values. Every conservative knows this now, as this knowledge has spread far and wide online. The spread of this knowledge, principally by conservatives, is what the Muslim activist was complaining about before the Justice Committee. However, to make this statement leaves us with two profound questions.

    1.) Was Cooper’s response appropriate or to the contrary, was it worthy of censure?
    2.) Does this information represent

    On Cooper’s response, it was poorly articulated. The argument that should have been made was that though conservatives spread this information, they are not to be blamed for the two massacres because they spoke truth. We cannot fathom the motives and what influenced these mass murders, because they fall so far from normalcy that from our perspective they were insane. We are not responsible for their actions. The entire internet cannot be shut down because it may trigger the insane.

    Does this information spread about Islam represent “Online hate”? No. It is Islam that hates. Islam hates the apostates and gays. Islam hates the Jews. Islam hates women. Islam hates anybody who is not a Muslim. To make this statement is not hate, just as to condemn the Nazis is not to condemn all Germans. “Not all Muslims… etc, etc, etc.” I am not speaking of Muslims here, each of which has their own interpretation of Islam. I am speaking strictly about the religion and political ideology of Islam.[/QUOTE]
    It’s true what you’re saying. The problem is that Trudeau is making it so no one can say anything about islam, and Scheer is going along with it.
    I’m not saying this would happen, but I wouldn’t be surprised if Trudeau made it so our internet was even more restricted somehow in the future. The whole world will look at Canada and say, “…They have a crazy leader that won’t let them have internet….”

  19. Avatar

    Listen to these shitheads. At least Bernier is saying the right things. Political manipulation of an official government transcript should be a criminal offense punishable by incarceration in the worst shithole prison we can find regardless of the wishes of the politicians.
    [URL=’https://youtu.be/2hrDtPNLGK0′][SIZE=4][B]Maxime Bernier – Michael Cooper Thrown Under The Bus By Andrew Scheer[/B][/SIZE][/URL]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *