Comments 4

  1. Hi Marc, there was some misinformation passed I would like to correct. I’m not accusing anyone of telling lies, but I have heard you speak on this before and you are misled. This is about the forestry industry in BC and I am a retired logger so please trust me on this. Replanting trees is not a bad thin g but it is part of a much bigger problem. Our Universities teach forestry technicians some good… but mostly NOT. A forest that has been clear cut is not replanted as a forest, but as a tree farm. Monoculture is not a forest, it is a disaster waiting to happen. A healthy forest has mixed species and mixed ages. A replanted forest will be one species (sometime two but far from equal numbers here). Mono culture tree farms are vulnerable to insect or fungal attacks. All the tree planting we have done in BC since forever has not replaced forests. Don’t be fooled, there is a big difference. Forests make soil to support the growth of… forests. Tree farms deplete and ruin soil. Another very important fact to understand, the second gen trees that we are harvesting may be 35-45 years old and these trees are seldom used for structural dimensional lumber. These young trees have short weak fibers and are not suitable for saw logs. Much of this timber is ground up to make paper! Or in the USA it is rather covertly burned to prodice steam to generate electricity. They call it bio-mass haha. Normies think this is somehow green energy production. Well, the tree were green at one point. I just wanted you and everyone concerned to understand that replanting trees after harvest is NOT a solution but as I mentioned above, a disaster waiting to happen. Thank you.

    1
    1. Post
      Author

      Hello! Thanks for the comment. So replanting a single crop on the clearcut forest isn’t the best response. And it seems that the people who are making these promises know that what they’re promising isn’t a real plan.

      Very interesting. What do you think would be a more viable solution?

  2. Here’s something I believe people are missing. People are saying incentivize Canadians to have children & if we could make it affordable they’d have them. But medically, testosterone levels have been decreasing since the 70’s & since early 2000’s by approximately 1% every year. Something else is afoot. Yep let me put back on my tin foil hat because I believe that’s on purpose. Whether it’s through medications, vaccines, whatever.. the fact is westerners are no longer capable of having more children & many of those that do have Planned Parenthood taking care of that faux pas. Even without the push for feminist ambitions, DINK’s, how dare you have children during climate change,etc. The fact is that it may be becoming physically impossible to have children & no amount of incentivization will work, thus immigration becomes a priority. Basically the same guy that’s running around slashing tires owns the tire shop. Those that are making it physically impossible to have children Pharma companies, GMO companies ( Monsanto, General mills, Bayer, etc) are on the front lines of facilitating mass immigration. Sorry guys but just a few drinks & a roll in the hay isn’t enough anymore.

    1. Post
      Author

      Do you know they use coke and pepsi (sprite and all the rest) as insecticides in Africa because they work and are a lot cheaper than real insecticides? I’m sure they taste better too.

      Children of men scenario is in play.

      1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *